professional article rewiew

This article talks about the best animated movies of 2015 and what was good and what was bad about them. These films were, Inside Out, the Good Dinosaur, Shawn the Sheep, the Peanuts movie, and Anomalisa. The author talks about the awards that the movies were given and he talks about wether he agrees with them. The author is stating specific awards and nominations for each movie. The article really is only talking about the awards and not about how they were made or how he thought the movies were. The author determined that some of the movies, to him, didn't get what they deserved and/or, got to much.
           I think the article should have focused more on not just the award the movies were given and focused more on how they were made and if that went into them getting the awards.

The author does stay on topic for the article. The only thing I would say, is that instead of just adding links to look at the awards, quote them so people don't have to leave your article. I do agree with the authors opinions on the awards and the way he critics them, makes me agree with him. As an animator, I would have liked t see more on how the movies were made.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2015/12/10/2016-golden-globes-how-animated-feature-nominees-sharpen-the-big-picture/